Volume 29, Issue 1 (7-2016)                   jdm 2016, 29(1): 39-46 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Anaraki S N, Karkehabadi H, Zadeh N Z G. Microleakage of three self-etch bonding agents in class 5 composite cavities. jdm. 2016; 29 (1) :39-46
URL: http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5473-en.html
1- Assisstant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assisstant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
3- Assisstant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (4231 Views)

Background and Aims: Microleakage is one of the most common problems in bonding systems, which cause different clinical shortcomings such as post operative sensitivity, marginal discoloration and pulp necrosis that can decrease those using bonding systems. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of three self etch bonding agents (generation 6 and 7) in class 5 composite cavities.

Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, 30 facial class 5 cavities were prepared in 30 human premolar teeth which were freshly extracted for orthodontic purposes. Cl V cavities were prepared in 2*3*2 mm dimensions. Occlusal margins were in enamel and gingival ones in cementum and randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 each. Then the cavities were treated by clearhil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan), G Bond (GC, Japan), and Opti Bond Solo Plus (Kerr, USA), according to the manufacturers’ insductions. Then the cavities were filled using Z100 resin composite. The specimens were then immersed in a 50% AgNo solution for 24 hrs. Then, the teeth were cut buccolingually to be evaluated for dye penetration with stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: This study revealed that Opti bond solo plus had type1 microleakage (dye penetration up to 1/3 of cavity) in 80% of specimen, and type 4 microleakage (along axial wall) in 10%. Clearfil SE bond had no leakage in 50%, type1 in 40% and type 2 (up to 2/3 of cavity) in 10%. But there was no significant difference in the microleakage at the gingival margins between 3 groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Clearfil SE Bond and G bond could prevent microleakage more effectively than that of Opti Bond Solo Plus on the occlusal margins. However, no difference in the microleakage on the gingival surfaces was found.

Full-Text [PDF 217 kb]   (2221 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: general
Received: 2016/06/22 | Accepted: 2016/06/22 | Published: 2016/06/22

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Dental Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb